Cross-check documents.
Flag inconsistencies for engineer review.
This demo illustrates how SLDs, load lists, cable schedules, panel schedules, and protection settings could be compared around common equipment tags.
What this concept could compare
Concept Demonstration Only
This prototype does not perform actual engineering calculations, design validation, code compliance checks, or document interpretation.
All data, findings, ratings, and document names are illustrative examples only.
Define the review context
Set project metadata and the intended cross-check scope.
Cross-check rules
Load the design package
Choose sample files or simulate selecting your own files locally.
Choose files for the demo
PDF, XLSX, XLS, CSV · Files are never uploaded or analyzed.
Run the conceptual cross-check
Watch a simulated review sequence. No document content is actually read.
5 documents · 84 mock equipment tags
Potential comparisons: rating, cable, CT ratio, load, setting presence, and tag consistency.
This button triggers a visual simulation only.
Potential inconsistencies
Illustrative issues for engineering review.
Select a finding
Choose an issue to compare the illustrative values side by side.
Review report preview
A conceptual output for issue tracking and engineer disposition.
Electrical Design Cross-Check Report
Concept Demonstration · Data Center Expansion - Phase 2
NOT FOR ENGINEERING USE
Executive Summary
This illustrative report demonstrates how document-to-document inconsistencies could be presented for engineering review. No actual engineering validation, calculations, or code compliance checks were performed.
Sample Findings
| ID | Equipment | Finding | Severity | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XC-001 | FDR-03 | Breaker rating mismatch | HIGH | Open |
| XC-002 | MCC-01 | Cable size inconsistency | MEDIUM | Open |
| XC-003 | TR-02 | CT ratio mismatch | HIGH | Open |
| XC-004 | UPS-01 | Load discrepancy | LOW | Review |
Demo actions
Buttons intentionally do not generate an engineering report.